Ahmed
Liquat, “Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World”, Kindle
Edition; Penguin Group
(2009) 505 pp.
Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World is a 2009 nonfiction book about
events leading up to and culminating in the 1930s Great Depression as told
through the personal histories of the heads of the Central Banks of the world's
four major economies at the time: Benjamin Strong Jr. of the New York Federal
Reserve, Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Émile Moreau of the Banque de France,
and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank. The book was generally well received by
critics, and won the 2010 Pulitzer Prize for History. Because the book was
published during the midst of the financial crisis of 2007–2010, the book
subject matter was seen as very relevant to then-current financial events.
The book discusses the personal histories of the four
heads of the Central Banks of the United States, Great Britain, France, and
Germany and their efforts to steer the world economy from the period during the
First World War until the Great Depression. The book also discusses at length
the career of the British economist John Maynard Keynes who criticized many of
the policies of the heads of the Central Banks during this time.
One of the main themes of the book is the role played
by the central bankers' insistence to adhere to the gold standard "even in
the face of total catastrophe." As Joe Nocera, a book reviewer at the New
York Times, stated, "the central bankers were prisoners of the economic
orthodoxy of their time: the powerful belief that sound monetary policy had to
revolve around the gold standard...Again and again, this straitjacket caused
the central bankers — especially Norman, gold’s most fervent advocate — to make
moves, like raising interest rates, that would allow their countries to hold on
to their dwindling gold supplies, even though the larger economy desperately
needed help in the form of lower interest rates."
Another theme that runs through the book is how
difficult it was to forecast the financial future and how events would
influence world events. "Mr. Ahamed’s opinions are made very clear (the
Paris Peace Conference’s plan for Germany to pay war reparations is presented
as a great blunder), but his overriding idea is that blame cannot be easily
assigned: not even the most sophisticated economists of the era could
accurately predict disaster, let alone guard against it. The effects of a
public herd mentality at the time of the 1929 stock market crash are depicted as
unstoppable."
My
Notes:
Pg. 11: Unlike
today when central banks are required by law to promote price stability and
full employment, in 1914 the single most important objective of the banks was
to preserve the value of the currency.
Because the value of a currency was tied, by law, to a specific quantity
of gold and because the amount of currency that could be issued was tied to the
quantity of gold reserves, governments had to live within their means, and when
strapped for cash, could not manipulate the value of the currency. Inflation therefore remained low. Joining the gold standard became a ‘badge of
honor.’ By 1914, fifty-nine countries
had bound their currencies to gold. Few
people realized how fragile a system this was, built as it was on so narrow a
base.
Pg. 15: Bubbles
and crises seem to be deep-rooted in human nature and inherent to the
capitalist system. By one count there
have been sixty different crises since the early seventeenth century up to and
including the latest 2008 crisis which is the most severe for seventy-five
years, since the bank runs of 1931-1933.
Pg. 154: After
WWI, there was a universal consensus among bankers that the world must return
to the gold standard as quickly as possible.
However, they did not all take the same route. The burden of deflation fell on workers,
businesses, and borrowers, that of devaluation on savers. The US and Britain
took the route of deflation, Germany and France that of devaluation.
Pg. 164: WWI left
most of the world’s gold in the US and the rest of the world with insufficient
reserves to grease the machinery of trade.
The world of the international gold standard had become like a poker
table at which one player has accumulated most of the chips, and the game simply
cannot get back into play. Pg. 172: It meant, in effect, that the Federal Reserve
was so flush with gold that it had gone from being the central bank of the US
to being the central bank of the entire world.
Pg. 167: The
gold standard had only worked in the late nineteenth century because new mining
discoveries had fortuitously kept pace with economic growth.
Pg. 168: Keynes’s
showed that inflation was much more than simply prices going up, but also a
subtle mechanism for transferring wealth between social groups—from savers,
creditors, and wage earners to the government, debtors, and businessmen.
Pg. 203: In
France a swindle that was never to be solved discovered $150 million of National Defense Bonds that were generally
issued in a bearer form and therefore untraceable, disappeared mysteriously
from the treasury—in relative terms the equivalent today would be a fraud of
$30 billion.
Pg. 308: It was
in 1928 with the Dow at around 200 that the market seemed to break free of its
anchor to economic reality and began its flight into the outer reaches of make-believe. During the next fifteen months, the Dow went
from 200 to a peak of 380, almost doubling in value. It was an obvious bubble. By November 13, 1929 the Dow had settled at
around 240—a 40 percent retreat over the eight weeks since the high in September;
it would be at 150 in 1932. The deepest
year of the US depression was 1932, production had fallen 25 percent;
investment dived a stunning 50 percent; and prices dropped another 10 percent,
reaching 75 percent of their 1929 level.
Unemployment shot up beyond ten million—more than 20 percent of the
workforce was now without jobs.
Pg. 451: On
Roosevelt’s first day in office he closed every bank in the country, imposing a
bank holiday until Thursday, March 9.
Simultaneously, he suspended the export or private hoarding of al gold
in the US. Most of Roosevelt’s program(s)
had little practical effect but great psychological effect. An unexpected but very effective action in
getting the economy moving again was the temporary abandonment of the gold
standard and the devaluation of the dollar.


No comments:
Post a Comment