Alan Taylor “American Revolutions: A Continental History,
1750-1804,” W.W. Norton, 2016, 480
pp.
All nations have their myths and the United States is
no exception. Alan Taylor presents the
truth about our revolution, showing that in fact it was a civil war with at
best forty percent of the population supporting it. In the end, at least 60,000 Loyalists fled
the nation for other parts of the British Empire. And, it was bloody: Twenty-five thousand
Americans in the military died in the war, 1 percent of the population, more
deaths proportionally than in any other war in our history except for the Civil
War. The war went on for eight years, the longest in our history until Vietnam,
and it touched all parts of the country, including its western regions.
My Notes:
Historians have estimated that between 15 and 20
percent of the 2.0 million whites in the colonies in 1775 were Loyalists, or
about 300-400,000 men, women and children. Numerous black Americans were also
Loyalists and some moved to the Province of Nova Scotia, British Canada, after
the war.
About 40% were Patriots and another 40% were neutral.
Pg. 2: As far
back as 1832, Nathaniel Hawthorne in “My Kinsman, Major Molineux” concisely
conveyed the internal essence of the revolution. He recognized that the struggle was our first
civil war, rife with divisions, violence and destruction that civil wars bring
about. However, historians and
politicians often miscast the American Revolution as the polar opposite of a
bloody revolution; bloodier revolutions occur elsewhere. They recall the American version as good,
orderly, restrained and successful when contrasted against the excesses of the
French and Russian revolutions. During
the Revolutionary War, Americans killed one another over politics and massacred
Indians, who returned the favors.
Patriots also kept one-fifth of Americans enslaved and after the war
60,000 dispossessed Loyalists became refugees.
Pg. 20: After
1700, British America imported 1,500,000 slaves: more than four times the
number of white immigrants. The slave
trade killed a tenth of the enslaved, primarily from disease, during transit
across the Atlantic from West Africa.
Pg. 63: The
Treaty of Paris (1763) ended the French and Indian Seven Years’ War between
Great Britain and France. In the terms
of the treaty, France gave up all its territories in mainland North America, including
Florida, effectively ending any foreign military threat to the British colonies. (Nearly all of Spain’s 3,700 subjects
withdrew from Florida in 1763, most went to Cuba).
Pg. 84: In 1774
the British Parliament passed the Quebec Act, which broke with the British
constitutional tradition that had excluded Catholics from government. Unlike the Irish, Canadian Catholics could
own land and serve on the governing council.
Troubled by defiance in other colonies, Parliament sought to secure
Canada by mollifying French Canadians.
Pg. 115: During
the 1760s, the colonists imported 365,000 slaves: more than in any preceding
ten-year period. Most of the enslaved
lived in the southern, plantation colonies, accounting for 60 percent in South
Carolina and 40 percent in Virginia. In
the mainland colonies as a whole, the enslaved comprised a fifth of the
population. The leaders of Virginia and
Maryland worried that they had more than enough slaves for their economy and
too many for security from revolt. To
discourage slave imports, their legislators levied heavy provincial duties, but
the Crown vetoed them at the behest of British slave traders.
Pg. 157: In
Paine’s Commonsense he pushed for
immediate independence, a union of thirteen states, and republican governments
for those states. All three goals broke
dramatically with past experience and received wisdom. No colonies in the Americas had yet revolted
from their mother empire; past bickering by the colonies augured poorly for a
union; and almost all former republics in Europe had been small, contentious, and
short-lived. Yet, Paine argued that
Americans could triumph by combining all three gambles: on independence, union,
and republic. Seeking one alone would
certainly fail, but the combination would prove invincible.
Pg. 206:
Benedict Arnold, in return for betraying the garrison at West Point in
1780 and embracing Loyalism, would receive £20,000 payment, a lifetime pension
of £500 annually, and a commission and command as a major general in the
British service. The British hoped that
such a high profile defection would discredit Congress and initiate a cascading
series of conversions. (Because the plot
at West Point was unsuccessful, these amounts were significantly reduced;
Arnold died in 1801 at the age of 60).
Pg. 212:
Revolutions breed civil wars: triangular struggles in which two sides
compete for civilian support. British
leaders wishfully believed that most colonists were Loyalists temporarily cowed
by a minority of brazen and bullying rebels.
In fact, although committed Patriots were a minority outside of New
England in 1775, the British confused the colonial majority, which preferred to
remain neutral, with committed Loyalists, who, in fact, were a minority even
smaller than the Patriots.
Pg. 274: During
the eighteenth century the Great Plains Indians acquired horses by trading or
raiding the Hispanics of New Mexico to the southwest. The horses seemed a divine gift to people
engaged in bison hunting. By killing
more bison, the Great Plains natives became better fed, clothed, and housed
than most colonists. They raised the
tallest children on the continent. The
alluring combination of horses and bison drew more native nations to relocate
onto the Great Plains.
Pg. 284: The
French and British valued their West Indian colonies more than anything on the
North American continent. Sugar cane
raised by slave labor enriched planters and the merchants who transported sugar
and rum to Europe. Taxes on slave
imports and sugar exports generated greater revenue for the rival empress than
any other colonial trade. So, the
British subordinated their war effort in North America to the defense of the
West Indies. They even drew on the New
York garrison as a reserve to bolster West Indian defenses at moments of
crisis.
Pg. 295: On
October 17, 1781, in Yorktown, Cornwallis opened negotiations to surrender his
army. Cornwallis further crippled
British prospects by accepting surrender terms that denied his Loyalist troops
the protection of prisoner-of-war status.
Unlike the redcoats, Loyalists taken at Yorktown risked harsh
punishment, even execution, as deserters and traitors by the Patriots.
Pg. 338: Not
until November 1777, more than a year after declaring independence, did
Congress agree on “Articles of Confederation and perpetual union.” Under the Articles, the states conceded only
a few, limited powers to Congress: to wage war, conduct diplomacy, and
arbitrate disputes between the states.
The Articles required ratification by all thirteen states to become
operative, and any future amendment also required unanimity, which discouraged
any change. The Articles built an
alliance of states rather than a cohesive nation.
Pg. 370: The
Articles of Confederation were so ineffectual in providing government that, in
private letters, Hamilton, Madison, Jay, and Washington worried that great
property might need a king’s protection.
In March 1787 Washington conceded that potential “utility” and perhaps
“necessity” of a switch to a monarchy but worried that such a counterrevolution
would shake “the Peace of this Country to its foundation.”
Pg. 373:
Contrary to modern belief, the founders did not intend to create a
national democracy. Instead, they
designed a national republic to restrain state democracies which they blamed
for the union’s woes. By restraining
democracy in the states, nationalists hoped to save republican government from
a descent into anarchy or a switch to monarchy.
They wanted also to preserve the union from splitting into several
smaller confederacies, or many individual states, which would contest
boundaries and settle differences with bloody wars.
Pg. 381: The
Constitutional convention had to compromise with the southern states, whose
population was made up of 40% of slaves (versus 5% in the north). By adopting the three-fifth clause allowing
representation to count each slave as equaling three-fifths of a citizen,
prolonging the allowance of slave importations for twenty more years (until
1808), and providing a fugitive-slave clause, the constitution defended
slavery. The delegates understood that
southerners would reject a constitution that did not secure their property in
human beings. (On April 30, 1789, Washington became President).
Pg. 434:
Conservatives today embrace Jefferson’s stances against taxes and for
states’ rights, but skip over his opposition to a military establishment, his
unease with inequality of wealth, and his push to separate church and
state. They like a Hamiltonian military
but not Hamiltonian taxes to pay for it. The diverse founders generated
contradictions that continue to divide Americans.
Pg. 446: The
First Amendment to the Federal Constitution barred the federal government from
creating a church establishment, but that ban did not apply to the states—which
became political battlegrounds between religious conservatives and their
evangelical critics. However, none of
the states created after the revolution provided for a church establishment,
and those of the old states gradually toppled: New York in 1777; Virginia in
1786; South Carolina in 1790; Maryland in 1810: Connecticut in 1818; New
Hampshire in 1819; and Massachusetts in 1833.
After the war, more college students studied law than divinity as
lawyers supplanted ministers in social prestige.
Pg. 458:
Growing steadily during the eighteenth century premarital pregnancy
peaked during the revolutionary generation at a third of brides.
Pg. 476:
Contrary to the wishful thinking of many Patriots, slavery did not
wither away after the revolution.
Instead, it became more powerfully entrenched in the southern
states. From 700,000 in 1790, the number
of enslaved doubled to 1.5 million in 1820.
Pg. 480: The
Civil 1861 War erupted over the terms of westward growth—that is, whether new
states would permit slavery.


No comments:
Post a Comment